|
||||||||||
| PREV NEXT | FRAMES NO FRAMES | |||||||||
| Packages that use TreeType | |
|---|---|
| story.dbcore.gui | |
| story.flashback.gui | |
| Uses of TreeType in story.dbcore.gui |
|---|
| Methods in story.dbcore.gui that return TreeType | |
|---|---|
TreeType |
Forest.getSelectedTree()
Return the selected tree among the Forest, including the repository ID and the node type |
| Methods in story.dbcore.gui with parameters of type TreeType | |
|---|---|
boolean |
TreeView.hierarchicalTree(TreeType type)
Should the tree for a certain type organize its nodes hierarchically, putting SUBTYPEOF and INSTANCEOF nodes inside their respective parents, or list all nodes without hierarchy? |
boolean |
DefaultTreeView.hierarchicalTree(TreeType type)
|
java.lang.String[] |
TreeView.nodeBin(TreeType type,
NodeAddress node)
How should nodes be sorted in the tree? |
java.lang.String[] |
DefaultTreeView.nodeBin(TreeType type,
NodeAddress node)
|
java.lang.String |
TreeView.nodeText(TreeType type,
NodeAddress node)
Given a node, what should the text of the node be in the Forest tree? |
java.lang.String |
DefaultTreeView.nodeText(TreeType type,
NodeAddress node)
|
boolean |
TreeView.useBins(TreeType type)
Should nodeBin() be used or should all the nodes just be listed without bins? |
boolean |
DefaultTreeView.useBins(TreeType type)
|
| Uses of TreeType in story.flashback.gui |
|---|
| Methods in story.flashback.gui with parameters of type TreeType | |
|---|---|
boolean |
ReferencesTreeView.hierarchicalTree(TreeType type)
|
java.lang.String[] |
ReferencesTreeView.nodeBin(TreeType type,
NodeAddress node)
Put a Reference node in as many bins as authors, one for each author. |
java.lang.String |
ReferencesTreeView.nodeText(TreeType type,
NodeAddress node)
|
boolean |
ReferencesTreeView.useBins(TreeType type)
|
|
||||||||||
| PREV NEXT | FRAMES NO FRAMES | |||||||||